The Legal Complexities of Converting a Nonprofit Healthcare Organization to a For-Profit Model: A Case Study of Summa Health

JEFF BARGE
Special to the Legal News
Published: April 22, 2025

The conversion of a nonprofit healthcare organization to a for-profit entity involves various legal, regulatory, and financial challenges. These conversions raise significant concerns about the preservation of charitable assets, the community's continued access to healthcare, and the fair valuation of the organization. Summa Health, an influential nonprofit healthcare provider in Ohio, may encounter numerous legal obstacles should it choose to convert to a for-profit model. This article examines the critical legal issues, focusing on the potential challenges of arriving at a fair price for the organization's assets, including models for asset valuation, with an emphasis on the Richmond Heights case, which provides relevant precedents for healthcare conversions in Ohio.
1. Nonprofit Conversion and Legal Challenges
The transition of a nonprofit healthcare institution, such as Summa Health, to a for-profit organization is heavily regulated. Legal challenges often stem from the following considerations:
• Charitable Trust Doctrine: Healthcare nonprofits like Summa Health are considered to hold their assets in trust for the benefit of the public. When converting to for-profit status, the nonprofit must ensure that its charitable assets are appropriately valued and protected. This issue was central to the Richmond Heights Hospital case (2005), where the sale of the nonprofit hospital raised concerns about the proper use of proceeds, particularly the protection of charitable assets.
• State Attorney General Oversight: Nonprofit conversions typically require the approval of the state attorney general to ensure that the conversion does not harm the public interest or divert charitable resources. The Richmond Heights case further exemplifies this process, where the Ohio Attorney General intervened to protect public health interests and charitable assets from being misused in the conversion process.
• Federal and State Tax Considerations: The conversion would trigger significant tax consequences, including the loss of tax exemptions that nonprofit status provides. A detailed analysis of the tax impact is crucial, as a conversion could lead to back taxes, penalties, or other liabilities.
2. Arriving at a Fair Price for Charitable Assets
One of the most complex legal issues in a nonprofit conversion is determining the fair market value of the organization’s charitable assets. This valuation is essential for ensuring that the community benefits from the conversion and that the proceeds are not unduly diverted for personal gain. Several pricing models are commonly used to arrive at a fair price:
• Net Asset Value (NAV): This model values the organization based on its net assets, which include tangible assets such as buildings, equipment, and inventory, as well as intangible assets like intellectual property and brand value. NAV is often considered the most straightforward model, as it focuses on the assets held by the organization without necessarily considering future earnings. However, it may not fully capture the future potential of the organization, especially for healthcare providers like Summa Health.
• Multiples of Earnings or Revenue: Another method for valuing nonprofit healthcare organizations is using multiples of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) or revenue. This model is commonly used in for-profit healthcare transactions and provides an estimate of the organization’s ability to generate income in the future. However, applying this method to a nonprofit conversion can be challenging, as nonprofit hospitals do not operate with the same profit motives as for-profit entities, and their financial statements may not reflect the true earnings potential.
• Enterprise Value (EV): Enterprise value is a more comprehensive model, incorporating the organization’s total market value, including both debt and equity. This method evaluates the worth of the entire organization, accounting for both tangible and intangible factors. For nonprofit hospitals, EV can be particularly relevant as it considers the value of future growth potential, including patient base, regional influence, and any unrecognized assets.
The Richmond Heights case provides a valuable reference in understanding how Ohio courts have approached the valuation of nonprofit healthcare organizations. In this case, the court required that any proceeds from the sale of the nonprofit be allocated to charitable purposes, and it insisted on a comprehensive appraisal to ensure that the conversion was fair and beneficial to the public. This reflects the broader principle that nonprofit assets must be used for public good, and their valuation must consider the long-term community impact.
3. The Richmond Heights Case: A Precedent for Ohio Healthcare Conversions
The Richmond Heights Hospital case (2005) provides a critical precedent in Ohio regarding the conversion of nonprofit hospitals to for-profit status. In this case, Richmond Heights Hospital, a nonprofit healthcare institution, sought to sell its operations to a for-profit entity. The Ohio Attorney General intervened, arguing that the sale would deprive the public of a valuable community asset and violate the charitable trust doctrine.
The Ohio Supreme Court ruled in favor of the sale but imposed strict conditions on the transaction. The court required that the proceeds from the sale be used exclusively for charitable purposes and that the hospital maintain a commitment to providing charity care in the community for a specified period. This case underscored the need for nonprofit healthcare providers to demonstrate that their conversions are in the public interest and that any proceeds will benefit the community.
For Summa Health, any effort to convert from nonprofit to for-profit status would likely face similar scrutiny, with an emphasis on protecting charitable assets and ensuring continued community healthcare access. A fair and transparent valuation of the organization’s assets would be required to satisfy both legal and public interest concerns.
4. Potential Impact on Summa Health's Community
Nonprofit healthcare providers are expected to deliver services that benefit the community, including charity care for underserved populations. A conversion to for-profit status could lead to changes in the organization’s focus, potentially prioritizing profit generation over community service. This shift could have significant consequences for access to healthcare, particularly for vulnerable populations who rely on nonprofit institutions for care.
The Richmond Heights case also highlighted the potential harm to the community when nonprofit healthcare providers shift to a for-profit model. The Ohio Supreme Court's imposition of conditions on the sale underscored the importance of maintaining a commitment to community health and charity care in any conversion process. For Summa Health, a similar outcome could be expected, requiring that the organization demonstrate how it will continue to serve the public after converting to for-profit status.
5. Conclusion
The legal and financial complexities of converting a nonprofit healthcare organization like Summa Health to a for-profit entity involve numerous obstacles, including issues related to the protection of charitable assets, community impact, and fair asset valuation. The Richmond Heights case provides an important legal precedent, demonstrating the scrutiny that such conversions face under Ohio law. In particular, the fair valuation of nonprofit healthcare assets is a critical aspect of ensuring that the community benefits from the transaction and that charitable resources are not diverted for private gain.
As Summa Health considers the possibility of converting to a for-profit model, it must carefully navigate these legal challenges, ensuring that the conversion process aligns with the public interest and is conducted transparently and fairly.
Jeff Barge is a Cleveland-based journalist and volunteer researcher for a group called Summa is Not for Sale which is a collection of citizens and healthcare workers who are opposed to the sale of Summa Health to a venture capital firm. He is a former writer for Crains New York Business and the American Bar Association. He can be reached at jeff.barge@yahoo.com.

[Back]

Portage County Legal News • 60 South Summit Street • Akron, Ohio 44308 • Phone: 330-376-0917 • Fax: 330-376-7001